TTDOTATT 729
ByteDance Doubles Down: Doubao Chatbot Now Takes 12% of Hotel Bookings
ByteDance's Doubao chatbot now takes 12% on hotel bookings, up from 8%, with October holiday hotel orders up 56% — and hotel prices sometimes higher than on Trip.com.

Itinerary
- ByteDance charges hotels roughly 12% on Doubao bookings, up from 8% under Douyin's ordinary-order rate.
- Hotel orders through Doubao rose more than 56% year over year during China's October holiday; no absolute count was disclosed.
- Trip.com Group posted 6.6 billion yuan (~$969 million) in accommodation-booking revenue in Q2, up 6%.
- Yicai found a Peninsula Beijing suite at 2,915 yuan on Doubao versus 2,332 yuan direct from the hotel.
- Meituan's Xiao Tuan AI searches grew 29% during the October holiday.
ByteDance now charges hotels roughly 12% on bookings completed through Doubao, its AI chatbot — up from the 8% those transactions previously carried as ordinary orders on its Douyin video app. That's a distribution-cost change travel sellers can't ignore, even if the absolute volumes remain undisclosed.
Doubao's travel traction is measurable, at least directionally. During China's October holiday, hotel orders through the chatbot rose more than 56% year over year, according to figures from Douyin's local-services unit. The company didn't release an absolute booking count. So we know the growth rate, not the base — an important distinction when the incumbent it might be displacing, Trip.com Group, booked 6.6 billion yuan (about $969 million) in accommodation revenue in the second quarter alone, up 6% from a year earlier.
How does the 12% fee compare?
On a 500-yuan room, the new rate costs a hotel 60 yuan, versus 40 yuan at the old 8%. A Shandong hotel manager told Dazhong News that conventional online travel agencies charge his property 11% to 13% — so the fee itself isn't an outlier. What's different is the wrapper. The middleman looks less like a booking site and more like a friendly, knowledgeable travel adviser.
One Chongqing guesthouse operator put the commercial logic plainly to Chongqing Daily: he could live with the higher fee if Doubao delivered customers he wouldn't otherwise reach. If it merely redirected people who would have booked through Douyin anyway, he wasn't interested. "It's the new customers that matter," he said.
Are consumers paying for it?
Possibly, though nothing is proven. In August, reporters at China's National Business Daily compared Doubao offerings against Douyin and Trip.com listings. In their sample, Doubao was frequently more expensive, sometimes by as much as 80 yuan (roughly $11).
A separate check by Yicai found a luxury suite at Beijing's Peninsula Hotel listed at 2,915 yuan through Doubao, versus 2,624 yuan on Trip.com and 2,332 yuan quoted directly by the hotel. Other reporters found cases where Doubao offered the lower rate. Discounts and booking terms complicate the comparisons, and none of these tests establishes that the AI commission caused the gap.
ByteDance, for its part, says merchants can't buy better recommendations. Liu Xing, a Doubao public-relations executive, said publicly that hotels pay a channel fee only when an order completes — not for advertisements or preferential rankings. Analyst Zhang Yi of iiMedia isn't fully reassured: "revenue sharing itself creates a risk of [customer] steering," he warned.
What does it mean for the incumbents?
The competitive question isn't whether a chatbot can recommend a room. It's whether it can handle cancellations, missed check-ins and disputes over what the hotel promised — problems established platforms have spent years learning to manage.
Trip.com has its own AI operation plus years of hotel relationships and booking infrastructure. Meituan reported that searches through its Xiao Tuan AI assistant rose 29% during the October holiday year over year. Alibaba has connected its Qwen chatbot to travel bookings and food delivery. Everyone is racing for the same conversation.
That's the real stake, as Qu Chuang, a digital-economy researcher at Shandong University, framed it: "We used to judge AI by active users and time spent. Now it's about how many people spend money through it."
An AI assistant hears travelers describe budgets, preferences and plans in their own words. Whoever owns those conversations may eventually control which hotels — and which booking platforms — get considered at all. For investors in Trip.com, Meituan, Booking Holdings and Expedia, the question is whether consumers keep opening booking apps in the first place.
For travelers, the old discipline still holds: before taking the chatbot's recommendation, check the price somewhere else. Until ByteDance publishes absolute booking numbers, that skepticism looks like sound portfolio management too.
via Google News: Online travel and booking (Source)
More from Daniel Okafor
Show full bio
Market editor covering technology and product news in Tourism industry coverage for trade professionals at Travel Trade Desk.
475 articles
Also boarding · Related articles
- CHI03:10
China Opens Probes Into Four Online Travel Booking Platforms
- TOU02:44
Tourism Fiji Partners With Douyin Travel on AI Planner
- ASI03:04
Asia Pacific Hotel Investment Climbs 21% to $8 Billion in H1 2026
- TRI12:25
Trip.com Faces Watchdog Scrutiny in FT Report on China's Largest OTA
- ASI15:05
Asia-Pacific Business Travel Spending Passes US$1.7 Trillion